taking western civ. If world civ is to be taught, then it should take two years to cover it, since one year is barely enough for what needs to be taught about western civ.[标签:标题]
We can learn a lot about ourselves from the looking glass of Iraq,wholesale toms shoes.American losses in November were 36 dead — the lowest of any November of the war. Once violent places like Fallujah and Ramadi are now quiet. Whatever is happening in Iraq — reasonable people can differ over the prognosis — all agree that the violence is abating at an astonishing rate. Advertisement Oil revenues are at all-time high with $98-a-barrel oil. The Sunni insurgency is not just tired, but tired of losing to the American military and being exploited by al-Qaeda in the bargain. Since bad news alone is news from Iraq, there is now very little about the war on our front pages or the evening network lead-ins.But as House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D., S.C.) presciently warned last July, such good news could present a “problem” for antiwar Democrats,toms with lace for men. And now it has. They invested in the failure of the surge, having successfully tapped into widespread public unhappiness over the absence of prior clear-cut victory. Some change in their position is now on the horizon and it won’t be the first time Democrats have had to adjust en masse.Most in the party voted in October 2002 to authorize George Bush to remove Saddam Hussein. Why exactly did the present group of antiwar Democrats line up for the war? Was it just legitimate fears of weapons of mass destruction, or the other twenty-some congressional writs they passed as casus belli and haven’t changed a bit?Perhaps — but they were also still giddy over the unexpected seven-week defeat of the Taliban, and the inspired efforts to fashion an Interim Transitional Administration, with the suave Hamid Karzai as its president. Because we had already defeated Saddam in 1991, and since pundits had proclaimed that a secular Iraq would be more malleable to reconstruction than a primordial Afghanistan of warlords, Democrats signed on for another war that might prove even easier to wage and quicker to win. Support for an easy victory in Iraq would only further confirm their reputation of being tough on national security in a post-9/11 world. When — in the manner of Sen. Clinton — they warned that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and was connected to al-Qaeda, they were only reiterating the standard Bill Clinton line throughout much of the 1990s. Indeed, most Democrats saw George Bush’s post-9/11 focus on the dangers of Baathist Iraq as simply the natural escalation from Clinton’s own policy of occasional bombings, embargos, and no-fly zones.But as the post-Saddam elections lined up — 2004, 2006, 2008 — and the reconstruction of Iraq proved bloodier than anticipated, the politics changed. The Democrats became the antiwar party. Prominent pro-war pundits flipped and cursed the effort. Journalistic exposés were published in serial fashion. Michael Moore reigned supreme. And disillusioned former administration officials and generals wrote supposedly brilliant opeds about how the war was lost, and how and why Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Wolfowitz — fill in the blanks — had not listened to their own inspired advice about reconstruction. It was time to pile on. Almost all Democrats did.Still, there were two caveats here. One, what to do about those embarrassing speeches on October 11 and 12, 2002, given by the likes of Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Harry Reid? The answer? Mostly ignore the past (‘that was then, this is now’). Or claim they were misled by the intelligence,discount toms shoes. Or at least remove that albatross by insisting that they never really expected a reckless George Bush to take them up on their sober and judicious authorization. The second problem was the nature of the growing antiwar mood in the country that after the pullback from Fallujah in April 2004 became frenetic. Democrats rashly fanned this national wildfire. By 2006 the conflagration had finally led to their return to power in Congress.Related articles:

• http://www.chuangdm.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1934114
• http://www.kingone55.com/
• http://xxk.jsw118.com/review.asp?NewsID=307

늇㯩궾ꀿ˩Ɬ銂䣧뮠䀗䔿㼲铨謩껨붺㇩覃뷤붯刈ꔮ㼿吖剙ꀿ跨떿⟥Ꞅ嬁㿧궅翦뺽裥ꆣ뫧꺊ꃯꎵ㼿㼗ꐢᏧꪡ芬◧艘ݐ爕曦郯ꎵ㼿ꡋꋨꮥь霒惮趆닩肗嘿櫨꾜鼿␨煗䡈㼞䍳洿㐸㿦꺈⯥駩莋㼰봠坤韩規Ḇ惨馳⁐ꀿᥨ᧨겣目龞㣧芨㽤꟥颊䧥詏雮邷埥ꊁ舿㷨鎦듥隒摞뽿蛩ꖏ⫦뎍䣩誇ᰃ鬧匿딿⃧꒑㽀댐㿩ꖷ࣮袜☂⩫⛩莼곩袼㿦钲继麵鳨모㌿㼧緥膾㿩몙擧꺠㽊剓漲㿩뢥瀂༿⁉䥍鏨醅ᣮ骍ȿ霠鸠뻩趁雮鲫㽂⍗껦ꎐ㭞㽼걪ץꎺ鏮馄齊댦练먡簐౉㍗构菩떲敟ꬡ㜦䋨馛㽨̿蹕덴㈯밠ꜩ鷨먿ꭥ㼧땽缟㼢⑅㼂鄋㼅ᅈꓯꎵ㼜럦鞁ꈸꄿᇥ躕礶鷨钰㼿騐齅㼫静뛮銽㿩뢚腘痥릋ᇮ莕娎櫦蚴飦蒂눰Ө궞㼋㏩颎敹㿩ꆹⓧ薏⣥겣慻⯦궡䥦伿锳遏㼿閨돐鸏㼓⃥뺝蘿䈾戴롊㽧뫦ꎪ尖᰿怿ꅍꫥ隯獙㼿냧鶒諧蚳뭷筿㻨ꐑ芬䅠栿ꕿ뗯ꎵ㼳囨薜땍婞⼿ꌞ㾂갇琰Ƃ곣莘긛껥题ꇥꞔ蝂ᘣ㽞篨ꊙ衯㗩몒賦릐᜿ꯦ릎뗩몙搿魎刻氳㿥銹㽏㽉꿨뒪ꑰᥥ㼳ყ銇僨蚲蠋ɐ㼵仩꺑✯᜿⫦蒠䈫輿猑룥蒎눩䳧膡㽳扨꽝⇨뎹釩醑塺᧧ꆁ㼿㍾湹尿˨벽霶湶戵餌䛦붉釨ꖳ啲脿ఇ社Ḥꄿ㿨覀褕就芬ݔ䀳日貘ᄳᔿ䨿轊䜿闦ꊜ㼈ꏥ몪㽠륜⫧ꪽ␂ꏦꖾ㔱ᬿ㽙뀧䕧丿뉂Ⱏ㽬둷刿ᡩር矮螋᤮诧龚닯ꎵ触뚕幂⏥銶꼿與丗以膣㿩뒤甿薳㿨蚉爿ꍅꄿࣦ뾻㛮銗敎㐾ꠗ㵦鳨銠聪䤌雨뾾畦㿮钐㼖秮芐鄪㽱崿ק躲⡝㿩몗擨늈譤阬㜿ؿཾ凩鶴伄ま鴿芬ߦ蚷⬿ꔿ㿩롰㿥耾摭叧躀昿㬢鯥ꆧ䃧貵ᔓ뜗鳩麉釩꾸焿듨뚖킒ˮ邈䧥覃琾踿鋯ꎵ덦嘟⥥姦說䁶䔿㿨鮻밓◩麎贒㿯ꎵ뗯ꎵ뱪‿䅆䕧鬿埩邛≜‎㔆⑈ㅬᬐ笰㽨끪蕨밠ᷥ膘ㄤ꘩⟧醁狩膝晇롴嵭㿧몟렿굺㼧錏빃裥ꊓ騿顤Ꮸ袲门邾磩骴㵥㑜餚㽓䘚㼿郧궘旯벢铮ꂑ㼝᱿뗦閼㽀䠄┿뗩꼰蜞뀠ӥ馜㿧궷껧蚮뙊仮鮫ꅴꛥ麶㿮鞼蹓깞癠㽓ꏥ뾬ṹȿ㿥뾓ꛧ낐鈙㿮鎼뼿䠸㽼귥ꂝ㼦䛧馃㽧獲㸣飧膖㼿᜿ꩯ椠勨频篩ꒊ䤿饤軦뚞姨뾂㼨봁딏㽗軦겻㿩邚į靗䜿㼜輣೦蒻밿䩥櫨ꂒ鬨浤㼿櫨芫赖㼿ᓨꆘ胧ꞏ雩ꂳ䌜婛ꔁ翯ꎵ뗧銈偁㽉锑㼇ꬿ㼿긔㿨ꢟ㼗ꔿⰕ䀖㇩讁䘿⬖搿政᫮鲬㼖귨북釧芫껧랳诧붫㽾虪킁ꯧ貒㼿⍧㹡護맦ꪤጿ꿩겊噍㼿긛〚䃩麠擦꺕ꐗㄥ磧螼ᤜ啯ⓥ뮡聵묿囧袻ꁍ鏥봽䬋曧ꎄ鷮鲝㝖㿩벝ㄣ댿ፇ橗Ῡ뚣㼿㼿Ꮶ骺㿯ꎵ뗨뮙㼐ͱɃ먪Ȗᠠ怌䠿븻ꩾ㿩꾎负虞뿦ꖖ鑧㟯ꎵ돧ꪍ蛧薰伥⼿甿⣨꒺뻮ꂚ嘝⴪ჩ讝㼮⹊赑舦䗩龀桏ủ鲢哨钜㼿饤诧릇曨ꚢ㼿栿В滦뚎䭓㼵࠿╀į뙶㣥鲝赼蟨붮蔿䐤봿㼿ไ焂㿩겧㌚驾꿩覠꟥덦⧨뾗䬕⧦떃葲䀗뗯ꎵ뗯ꎵ锶蟩ꖠ㿦ꞿ㿦뺓壤릢뗨颒蝣蛮閺㼿‎Ի댎ᔧ⌿빡氿扚ݹ㽍屓౹ᅯ䔡䴘㿥ꮶ逩ᗮ麹鴿腖㽈鈹∷ᙥ༵ቦဈ딤芬գ鬏蝫蔟╨錤㿨랠䬈烥銋Ю购⍤ଣ鹢癩롘跩늠㷦颞愙帿⿦貈轱触ꂔ迨麹㽄㿩鞅⃧骝㼿砿懣膈⬂ᣨ颢㿯ꎵ뗮貂鄞茔㼆堿㸔⃦骕롖‿䐌㼡곧ꖜ렃꠿㼲迧螺굶ꅱ䳨閳ؿ稖櫥ꢨ㽔匜ꚕ건以ꊁ僨ꢞ娏ߦ讬㹳ฒ꘱郦銕㽖뫧꾓⃨膨耿㿥릆哩馸魃꘿뭙䥉鋥뢀嬥齰㼿㼔鉈爈⛦颺뗯ꎵ锝䀪㽜✿ߨ胧꾢㼂兲⳯ꎵ㽇觩覐蕆ᰪ䙐栨䥾㽀丿п䞂걖筼덶棩蚁㽌㙙଩寮骹荻帰㬷㴿軥ꆵ㟨뢍봸㽾괿뜿븖谿᫤못壧閉㘿饤ꔿ栿鰿䜿ǧ뎕࿥颚映眈㼡芬ϧ颈ဢ㷮袤ꁒꌆ霿ؿᘰ硞뫧蒀诧뢹ꙴꩽ㼛菦ꂤ蜜긳뗯ꎵ題嫨芊䫩ꖕ୑‑ᠢ㽽㌿㿩閮ℿቱ逾ꫮ醨⁩봘‿㼿叩鮷淦鮗㼶⛧뒗䈁뼡㿦늉Ԍ㽩㿦�,ray ban pas cher*Related articles:


   http://www.247111.com/viewthread.php?tid=4393097&extra=

   http://www.naija.fm/community/members/home

   http://202.43.33.242/~muaythaist/index.php?topic=50982.msg52264#msg52264