ah doesnt matter to me but one thing i sure hindus are the greater in nos. so it will help bjp in the coming lok shaba elections ..there is no solution to such issues untill and unless people are matured enough to undrstand what is important for us .. 2:46 am October 1, 2010 tej wrote: If there is a God, and he/she were witnessing this ,I really wonder what he/she would suggest.As much as I agree that India has more important issues to address, I think its unfair to expect that this place should have been converted to a playground etc. There are sentiments and feelings to consider. After all, no one would suggest that of Jerusalem now would they? No one would dream or dare to say any such thing about Mecca either right?So, lets respect the sentiments of Hindus and their beliefs in the same way. The judgment reminds me of property dispute settlements within a family. And that s not a bad thing. After all, we are a family we are Indian. 2:47 am October 1, 2010 An Indian wrote: If there is a God, and he/she were witnessing this ,toms shoes sale,I really wonder what he/she would suggest.As much as I agree that India has more important issues to address, I think its unfair to expect that this place should have been converted to a playground etc. There are sentiments and feelings to consider. After all, no one would suggest that of Jerusalem now would they? No one would dream or dare to say any such thing about Mecca either right?So, lets respect the sentiments of Hindus and their beliefs in the same way. The judgment reminds me of property dispute settlements within a family. And that s not a bad thing. After all, we are a family we are Indian. 7:40 am October 1, 2010 AV wrote: I wish the media would be more responsible in reporting this event. they are trying to misrepresent facts in such a manner which can ignite public sentiments.Before I say anything further, I would like to clarify that I m a person who had argued in early 1990s that even if a temple stood at the foundation of the mosque, the mosque should not be destroyed. The destruction of the mosque was a shameful act and should not have happened by any means.I had not looked at he details of his case at that time. Now,tomsoutletsalecheap.com, post-verdict yesterday, the Allahabad High Court has made all documents of the public and I have had a look at them. Those who wish to see it, please go to http://rjbm.nic,tomsoutletsalecheap.com.in/ Of special note are the conclusions reached by the Justice SU Khan, who was part of the bench (see link above).I find that the journalists have grossly distorted he facts of the case.Following are some of the main features of this case This case was not filed to decide about the temple or the mosque or their destruction. Rather, this case was filed to claim rights over he ownership of the land n which these structures are built. This case was not he case to decide the rights of two communities, but it was a case filed to claim land ownership by three groups of people as far as the legal framing of the case goes. Thus, this was a case of property ownership by groups of individuals and n Related articles:

• cheap toms 2011 blogs.wsj.com wrote
• toms shoes sale 顥夌簬璇�\铮�娣よ仺绶�顥戦儖鎴
• toms shoes sale 2010 Wasted Mind wrote