wable energy sources such as solar power, wind and biofuels rather than opening the spigots on new sources of petroleum. But the simple fact of the matter is that solar power and wind can’t fulfill the vital role non-renewables play in the U.S. economy. As for biofuels, the 2007 mandate requiring the production of 36 billion gallons by 2022 has exacerbated an increase in world food prices without doing anything to lessen the pain at the pump.Receiving no help from their leaders, Americans have taken it upon themselves to achieve savings in the face of skyrocketing fuel costs. Simply put, we are driving less. Now it’s time for Congress to meet us halfway. Superior U.S. technology has made it possible to drill in the environmentally sensitive areas off our coasts with minimal disturbance to the surrounding ecosystem. Better increased production in the U,pochette longchamp pas cher.S. than in other countries with worse environmental track records,sac longchamp le pliage. With oil nearing $130 a barrel, there are no good arguments left for keeping this supply off the market. If members of Congress really care about helping Americans who are sacrificing in the wake of high gas prices, the best thing they can do is just get out of the way.[标签:标题]
‘Killing an Unarmed Man.” That is how the front-page headline in the New York Times characterized an incident in which a man tried to run over a policeman with his car and was shot by three policemen on the scene, including his intended victim.An automobile is a deadly weapon. If you are killed by an automobile, you are just as dead as if you had been shot through the heart.A phrase like “an unarmed man” makes a talking point — as if matters of life and death should be discussed in terms of how you can spin a talking point. Advertisement The biggest and most common talking point when the police fire at someone is counting how many bullets they fired. There are politicians, media people, and — above all — community activists who can work themselves into a rage over how many bullets were fired.If we stop and think — which of course the demagogues hope we will never do — it is hard to see any moral difference between killing someone with one bullet or with dozens of bullets.People who have never fired a gun in their lives say that they cannot understand why the police fired so many bullets. If it is something that they have never experienced, there is of course no reason why they should be expected to understand.But, even after confessing their ignorance, such people often proceed to spout off, just as if they knew what they were talking about.It is very easy for a pistol shot to miss, even in the safety and calm of a firing range, much less in a desperate situation where a decision must be made in a split second that can cost you your life or end someone else’s life,grande sacoche longchamp pas cher.In a life-and-death situation, nobody counts how many bullets he is firing, much less how many bullets others are firing. It is not like a western movie, where the hero whips out his six-shooter, fires one time, and the villain drops dead Related articles:

• http://bsfx.njust.edu.cn/plus/view.php?aid=201694
• http://www.ylmsy.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=898002
• http://www.mailvsu.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=182991&do=blog&id=3216914