Toms Shoes Outlet Store Sale first reported by Bl
Printed From: PHAworkers Online
Category: General
Forum Name: Rumor Mill
Forum Discription: Discuss/Debunk what you've heard somewhere.
URL: http://www.phaworkers.org/forum//forum_posts.asp?TID=102972
Printed Date: Feb 03 2026 at 12:44am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 8.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Toms Shoes Outlet Store Sale first reported by Bl
Posted By: dh5f7dtfa
Subject: Toms Shoes Outlet Store Sale first reported by Bl
Date Posted: May 15 2013 at 2:47pm
eporter Matthew Cooper’s accounts of a July 11, 2003, telephone conversation–falls far short of being the basis for any prosecution, much less a perjury charge. Advertisement Two days ago, in a front-page story headlined “Testimony By Rove And Libby Examined; Leak Prosecutor Seeks Discrepancies,” the Washington Post reported that Plamegate special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald “has been reviewing over the past several months discrepancies and gaps in witness testimony in his investigation of the unmasking of CIA operative Valerie Plame.” One such discrepancy, the Post reported, involved vice-presidential chief of staff Lewis Libby. The other involved Rove: Prosecutors have also probed Rove’s testimony about his telephone conversation with Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper in the crucial days before Plame’s name was revealed in a syndicated column by Robert D. Novak.Rove has testified that he and Cooper talked about welfare reform foremost and turned to the topic of Plame only near the end, http://www.tomsoutletsaleonlinecheap.com - Toms Shoes Outlet Store Sale , lawyers involved in the case said. But Cooper, writing about his testimony in the most recent issue of Time, http://www.tomsoutletsaleonlinecheap.com - toms shoes online , said he “can’t find any record of talking about” welfare reform. “I don’t recall doing so,” Cooper wrote.The apparent discrepancy, first reported by Bloomberg News, is, according to the Post, evidence that Fitzgerald’s investigation “has ranged beyond his original mission to determine if someone broke the law by knowingly revealing the identity of a covert operative.” Another Post account, citing the Cooper-Rove discrepancy, quoted an informed source saying that Fitzgerald is now ” looking at a coverup: perjury, obstruction of justice, false statements to an FBI agent.’”But speculation that Rove’s conversation with Cooper might somehow form the basis of a perjury charge has no basis, according to knowledgeable sources. There are two reasons. The first is that there is solid evidence to support Rove’s version of events. The second is that, even if Rove’s account were incorrect, a conflict in testimony about welfare reform is not material to the Plamegate case.First the evidence. Two weeks ago, Rove lawyer Robert Luskin told NRO that Cooper called Rove on July 11, 2003, and that Cooper began the conversation by talking about welfare reform. After a brief talk about that issue, Luskin explained, Cooper then changed the subject to WMDs and the controversy surrounding former ambassador Joseph Wilson.But when Cooper testified before the grand jury, he said he did not recall talking to Rove about welfare reform–”I can’t find any record of talking about it with him on July 11,” Cooper wrote in his Time account of his testimony, “and I don’t recall doing so.” That, plus Cooper’s statement that he was questioned closely about the issue during his grand-jury testimony, led to the current speculation that Rove might have given a false account of the conversation before the grand jury.But there is more to the story. Just moments after finishing his conversation with Cooper, http://www.tomsoutletsaleonlinecheap.com - Toms Shoes Outlet Sale , Rove wrote a description of the talk in an e-mail to Stephen Hadley, who was then the deputy national-security adviser. The e-mail indicates that the two men did indeed begin their conversation with welfare reform. “Matt Cooper called to give me a heads-up that he’s got a welfare reform story coming,” Rove wrote in the e-mail, which was first reported by the Associated Press. “When he finished his brief heads-up he immediately launched into Niger…”The e-mail appears to be solid, at-the-time evidence that the two men discussed welfare reform. “It appears that Rove’s recollection of a conversation having been initiated about welfare reform is consistent with a contemporaneous e-mail he wrote to Hadley moments after he hung up the phone with Cooper,” says a knowledgeable source.In addition, in a less-quoted section of his article in Time, Cooper himself acknowledged that he might have inquired about welfare reform. Cooper wrote that after reviewing his e-mails from the days in question, “i
Related articles:
- http://www.bizziebaby.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=145161&PID=159332#159332 - http://www.bizziebaby.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=145161&PID=159332#159332
- http://www.ttgdtxbinhlong.edu.vn/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=52601&PID=63633#63633 - http://www.ttgdtxbinhlong.edu.vn/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=52601&PID=63633#63633
- http://www.patientaction.com/component/blog/comments?pid=387759 - http://www.patientaction.com/component/blog/comments?pid=387759
|
Replies:
Posted By: ryrycvcd
Date Posted: May 15 2013 at 4:10pm
Prosecutors have not made any specific criminal allegations, http://www.abercrombievfrancevparis.fr - abercrombie france . Launching separate investigations into CPRIT are the Texas attorney general's office and the Travis County district attorney's public integrity unit, which investigates criminal misconduct within state government.
An NCI designation is not required for CPRIT to continue running the nation's second-largest pot of cancer research dollars, Khan said. But jeopardizing that status — and especially losing it — would be a severe blow to CPRIT's reputation, which already has been battered by sweeping resignations, internal accusations of politics trumping science and now a criminal investigation.
Members of CPRIT's governing board did not immediately return an email seeking comment.
A recent internal audit at CPRIT discovered an $11 million funding request from Dallas-based Peloton Therapeutics was approved without the agency ever scrutinizing the proposal's merits, http://www.abercrombievfrancevparis.fr - abercrombie . The revelation came only months after two Nobel laureates and other top scientists left the agency in protest over a $20 million grant some accused of being rushed to approval without a proper peer review.
NCI spokeswoman Aleea Farrakh Khan told The Associated Press that officials are "evaluating recent events" at CPRIT. She said officials have not made decisions or contacted the agency directly, http://www.abercrombieandfitchsoldesv.fr - abercrombie .
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, http://www.surgicalprincipals.com/cheapnfljerseys.aspx - cheap nfl jerseys , rewritten or redistributed.
Follow Paul J, http://www.abercrombieandfitchuk8k.co.uk - abercrombie and fitch . Weber on Twitter: www, http://www.poloralphlauren5k.fr - polo ralph lauren .twitter.com/pauljweber
"It says, 'If I'm donating money to this agency, if NCI is approving them, that means NCI says it's handling its money well,'" Khan said.
Khan added that CPRIT's inclusion on the list does not mean all of its funding mechanisms are NCI-approved, http://www.hoganscarpe6a.it - hogan .
___
The designation is a federal seal-of-approval that signals high peer review standards and conflict of interest policies. Yearlong turmoil within the Texas institute, or CPRIT, http://www.rayban5k.fr - lunettes ray ban , reached a new peak this week when the agency's beleaguered chief executive asked to resign and prosecutors opened cases following an $11 million grant to a private company that was revealed to have bypassed an independent review.
By PAUL J. WEBER, Associated Press
An entire page of CPRIT's website is devoted to boasting its NCI designation. The agency says the status is important because it means cancer centers in Texas seeking its own NCI designation —, http://www.hollisterukoutlet7k.co.uk - hollister ; so as to reassure patients or bolster recruitment — can include CPRIT research dollars in their calculations to maintain levels needed to be NCI approved.
While CPRIT is funded by taxpayers, donors to cancer nonprofits might look to an NCI designation for assurance that their money is in good hands.
Executive Director Bill Gimson submitted his resignation letter Tuesday but offered to stay on through January. He has described Peloton's improper funding as an honest mistake and said no one associated with CPRIT stood to personally profit from the company's award.
AUSTIN, http://www.hollisterukoutlet7k.co.uk - hollister uk , Texas (AP) — The National Cancer Institute confirmed Friday that federal officials are taking a closer look at a troubled $3 billion cancer-fighting effort in Texas that is under a criminal investigation over a lucrative taxpayer-funded grant awarded by the state agency, http://www.poloralphlauren5k.fr - ralph lauren .
There is no funding relationship between the NCI and CPRIT.
"This enhances Texas' ability to leverage additional federal funding for cancer research and raises Texas' profile as a center for cancer research," according to the website, http://www.rayban5k.fr - ray ban .
The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas touts its status as an NCI-approved funding entity — an exclusive group headlined by the nation's most prominent cancer organizations. The list is fewer than two dozen and includes the American Cancer Society, Susan G. Komen for the Cure and federal entities like the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Related articles:
http://hannahelogeblog.com/2011/06/zambia/ - http://hannahelogeblog.com/2011/06/zambia/
http://tech-seeker.com/blog/battle-of-the-hosting-platforms-windows-vs-linux-vs-mac/ - http://tech-seeker.com/blog/battle-of-the-hosting-platforms-windows-vs-linux-vs-mac/
http://www.onlyacne.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1 - http://www.onlyacne.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1
Sabir K. was arrested in Pakistan in 2010 and expelled to the Netherlands in 2011. A Dutch summary of his U.S. indictment says he worked with al-Qaida from 2004-2010.
|
|