eltdown in South Asia in the last six months, touched off by political debate and new regulation. We’ve sobered to the fact that we’re not going to “put poverty in a museum” through microfinance, as Mr. Yunus said, and that we may need to revise the model.With companies still struggling to understand how to contribute to economic development and reach the base-of-the-pyramid customer, we are in need of new, inclusive business models and new case studies that involve social change. It no longer works to point to microfinance as a model to live by, or to continually reference the same models when many of them are defunct, or struggling to find a market.Having worked in the social development arena in India, where social innovation is practically in the blood, I have seen the energy, hope and ideas coming from people doing business at or with the base of the pyramid today. These entrepreneurs strive to close the gaps that government will not fix, and that profit-first private enterprise cannot justify. But, if we are realistic about the magnitude of the challenges we face, these entrepreneurs are a drop in the bucket. They struggle to reach scale, http://www.cheaptomsshoesoutletstor.com - toms shoes discount , to take their impact from several hundred to several hundred thousand or million, http://www.cheaptomsshoesoutletstore.us - toms shoes sale , and to expand their models to new geographies.Is there an opportunity to harness the power of capitalism while spiriting the hope and energy of social enterprise? With more companies aware of the need for more inclusive growth, in the near future we will likely see more business leaders exploring models that contribute to the planet’s resilience, and therefore, their own companies’ resilience.Some of these companies are already headed in that direction. For all the criticism heaped on Wal-Mart, the company has made strides in making its supply chain friendly to farmers. For instance, the company has committed to working directly with 1 million smallholder farmers in China by 2012, providing them with salaries 10 to 11 times what they would otherwise make off the land.Meanwhile, Novartis continues to provide medicine as well as health education and disease prevention counseling to 30,000 rural villages across India through its profitable Arogya Parivar program. (Note: Novartis is a client of ours.)While many of us would prefer local solutions and admire the beauty of small business, these companies have the ability to impact millions of lives because of their sheer size.Many of us—from development consultants to researchers to economists—want to believe Mr. Prahalad’s argument that we can eradicate poverty through profits. Business leaders want to believe in it, too. But, with the exception of a handful of projects, many big businesses have struggled to make inroads at the base of the pyramid. To drive large-scale change, we must find better ways for big business to contribute to societal good, http://www.cheaptomsoutlet0.com - toms the shoes .Over the next several weeks, I’ll be exploring the intersection of private enterprise and social enterprise. I welcome your comments and ideas.Lindsay Clinton is a researcher and d
Related articles:
- http://www.pt5123.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=60012 - toms the shoes all considered. I don t see Pakistan
- http://www.sciencebuddies.org/blog/2013/04/a-few-hours-left-view-iron-man-content-to-support-science-buddies.php#comments - toms shoes discount
- http://www.fantasymakersindustries.com//cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1367534173/0#0 - toms outlet sports
|